Home | About us  | Our Advisors | Submit Papers | Submit News | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact talktous@mycoordinates.org  
 
 Previous Issues ( Preview / download )  
Who can forget December 26, 2004? The tsunami, the devastation and the death. Millions lost life and many more lost the desire to live. There was sympathy empathy and apathy. Descriptions and prescriptions. Reactions and responses too. Many were ‘moved’ then life ‘moved on’… This tsunami tends to fade away in the pages of history… Three years down the line, Coordinates visits those for whom the tsunami is still a possibility, a reality and a challenge.
“Everybody is committed to their task”
Prem Shanker Goel
is Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES). He is alsoChairman, Earth Commission.
The National Tsunami Early Warning System (TEWS) established by Ministry of Earth Sciences. Coordinates discussed various aspects of the TEWS with Dr P S Goel, Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Earth Sciences
Do we have well-established tsunami evacuation procedures?
Mandates are divided across various ministries to do different things. As a science ministry, it is our mandate to issue warning for Tsunami and inform those agencies who are supposed to take care of the mitigation. It is largely the Home Ministry which is responsible, through their large access to paramilitary forces and other organizations to organize evacuation. The district administration reports to them. There are other authorities, such as Disaster Management Authority, who are making sure that such capacity building mechanisms come up in the country. However, I am also aware that the country has good preparation which you can see when the recent cyclone struck two months ago. A massive exercise of shifting people was undertaken by these arms of the government, and was done very well. When it comes to evacuating people, the method is not different whether you have to relocate because of cyclone or tsunami.
TEWS has not undergone realtime testing. Please comment.
For an event, particularly in the Indian Ocean which happens once every 60 years, you obviously cannot have a frequent real-time testing. But if you look at it as a science, you don’t need an earthquake or a tsunami of that magnitude to test the system. A system consists of various elements. In this case, we have sensors at the bottom of the ocean, various tide gauges, seismological equipment, and we are getting seismological data from across the world. Each of these individual systems is tested 24 hours. For example, we have placed the Bottom Pressure Recorders (BPR) at the depth of, say, 3km which gives a reading every hour. So we know whether the recorder is working or not. It is also highly accurate. We know how the variations take place with respect to the normal tides so we know exactly how the BPR is working because all these tides have a definite mathematical model. Similarly, the tide gauges are also tested. The seismological equipment is tested very frequently because there are so many earthquakes taking place at a low magnitude. When these work for low magnitude, they will also work for high magnitude. Most of the equipment is being tested and monitored by computers on a 24 hour basis.
What if the central processing unit of the BPRs fails?
The systems are planned with a sufficient amount of redundancy. We have established the system with six BPRs – four in the Bay of Bengal and two in the Arabian Sea. Our original configuration is actually for twelve BPRs to maintain very high level of redundancy. When it comes to the actual detection of the tsunami, one BPR on each side is sufficient. We have placed four. For data correlation, we will further multiply this redundancy.

The ocean is a very difficult environment. Maintaining the equipment is difficult, particularly when the sea is rough for about four months. Thus the complete chain of sensors has more than 100 per cent redundancy. Any one failure should not cause any problem with respect to the functioning of the system anywhere in the chain.
 
 |  Next Page >>
 
January 2008
"New GNSS will cause a synergetic effect and not chaos”
  Sections
 
 
  Good News!  
  A sigh of relief for GPS/GPRS mobiles!
 
  An apparatus will be classified as a mobile phone rather than an ADP machine or camera or GPS receiver when its principal function is telephony…
 
  India National Map Policy  
National Map Policy

Guidelines for implementing National Map policy
  Partnership  
Navigation India 2008
20-21 November
New Delhi
Osman@telematicsupdate.com
GEOExpo 2008 China
2 - 4 December 2008,
Shanghai, China
sales@chinageo-expo.com
The Munich Satellite Navigation Summit 2009
3-5 March
Munich, Germany
info@munich-satellite-navigation-summit.org
TRANS-NAV 2009
17-19 June
Gdynia, Poland
transnav@am.gdynia.pl
 
 
   
Home | About us  | Our Advisors | Submit Papers | Submit News | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact