The following section provides a few recent case studies with which the authors have been involved when asked to provide suitable height data to a 3D GIS.

This project involved the visualisation of a proposed elevated roadway in Karachi. The roadway is to be built along an existing corridor between multi-story buildings. The task was to illustrate the visual impact of the roadway on the cityscape. As the task was primarily one of information and promotion, the client was keen to maximise the reality of the visualisation. It needed to be interactive and lifelike, to stir enthusiasm amongst the decision makers for the project. Field crews took digital photographs of the major buildings so as to provide the necessary building texture and appearance to the visualisation (Fig 5). The road design was incorporated into the visualisation dataset.

The client was also keen on maximising the accuracy of the visualisation, but the local aviation and government infrastructure was not able to support a LiDAR survey of the route. Instead, building locations and heights were approximated with basic field survey techniques. The result was a high resolution (LoD 2), low accuracy visualisation, employed in an application which gave interactive flythrough capabilities to the client. In this case, the level of accuracy did not detract significantly from the project outcomes.

As urban development around coastal waterways increases, the need for legal clarity on who is responsible for which areas is becoming more important. Most jurisdictions have legislation which refers to tidal boundaries. Terms such as “low water mark”, “Highest Astronomical Tide”, “tidal influence” etc abound in legislation, but cannot be easily marked out on the ground. Problems arise when these boundaries have to be delineated accurately on the ground as their extent depends upon tidal variations, and upon coastal terrain models. Recent examples involved a cadastral boundary extending down to “the high water mark”, the local Ports Authority responsible for areas “to the High Spring Tide” mark, but the Environment Department interested in “5m above the high water mark” for the monitoring of acid-sulphate soils. The issue is further complicated as coastal terrain models are frequently changing by erosion and accretion.

In Australia, the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines is undertaking a pilot programme which seeks to clarify the processes and derive the tools to resolve these boundary conflicts (Todd (2005)). The programme uses a LiDAR definition of the coastal zone (flown at low tide) to define the current terrain shape, plus a series of tide gauges to establish the local tide model. Specialised software was written to find the intersection between the two 3D surfaces: terrain shape and tide model. From these lines of intersections, the horizontal extent of the legal boundaries can be found.

In the example shown in Fig 6, the landowner thinks he owns the property defined by the black lines (the “cadastral boundaries”). However State Legislation limits his ownership to “Mean High Water Spring Tide”, show in blue. Clearly there are large areas of land where he thinks he owns but does not. Finally, the red line denotes “Highest Astronomical Tide” defining the extent where the landowner has limited control as separate legislation has conferred rights and obligations to the local Ports Authority.

Only by applying the 3rd dimension to this application has the true legal boundaries been established. The consequences of these queries are often minor, but can become considerable when applied to prime riverside properties, or in areas under consideration for development. This research is also being used to create storm-surge models in coastal areas.

Recently, AAMHatch created a 3D model of the City of Melbourne. The odel was created using specialised photogrammetric techniques, which involve the measurement of the building’s 3D shape from highresolution aerial photography. These 3D city models have an inherently high degree of accuracy so they can be confidently used in analysis and measurement, such as when determining height restrictions.

The 3D model is a “living model”, which will be regularly updated from new aerial photography. The savings in development proposal review, consultation and dispute resolution are potentially significant, and now form the major business justifications for 3D visualisation in city management. Large savings annually in legal and submission costs have been demonstrated.

In practice, the 3D model is used as the reference for appraising proposed developments interactively, by inserting the proposal in the model to determine the shadows and reflections it casts, which views it obscures and what it will look like from any viewpoint.

Advances in 3D computer software and performance have meant that more realism can be employed in the 3D model by using digital photos of the actual building facades, as well as trees and other objects such as street furniture, as textures for the 3D model.

Samples of Melbourne CBD streetscape modelling are shown in Fig 8 and 9.

Another interesting application where the 3rd dimension is now available to GIS is in the Electricity Industry. Utility GIS systems have evolved in line with advances in software and survey techniques. First generation GIS systems were largely schematic, where network and assets were largely recorded by connectivity diagrams. Next came the AM/FM applications where their geographic location could be entered with full asset and connectivity details. Spatial queries such as “identify five year old insulators within 10km of the substation” were now possible. The emergence of LiDAR as a viable survey technique has provided the Electricity Industry with the third dimension on their transmission networks. Spatial queries such as “Identify those spans along this route where the conductors are closer than 5m to the underlying vegetation” (see Fig 10). These queries can be extended to: “If I were to pump 5% more electricity down this line, the temperature of the conductors will rise by 4°, and will sag 0.5m lower. Show me the spans where this 0.5m sag will cause clearance concerns”. In these days of increasing energy demand and high cost of building new transmission lines, these queries can be very powerful.

A project recently completed for Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) supplied the third dimension to the major north-south transmission lines running between Kuala Lumpur and Penang. The LiDAR project provided the 3D survey data, software and training for TNB to perform these lineoptimisation queries, to allow TNB to achieve the maximum line loading in a safe and well managed process (Fig 11).

The final case study presented here involves a 3D survey in an industrial site. The project involved a major expansion to a minerals processing plant. The design engineers needed an accurate plan of the current structure, so they could design, construct and fit the extension structures with minimal downtime on the operating plant. The third dimension in this case was supplied by Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS). This survey technique employs a similar technology to the LiDAR system, except that the laser sensor is mounted on a tripod and the measuring laser measures the structure to millimetre precision and millimetre point spacing. The benefit of the TLS is that it is able to supply an accurate 3-dminesional definition of complex structures as diverse as piping, building facades, structures under load or rock faces. The data is acquired without contact, allowing definition of unstable landforms, hot engineering surfaces, vibrating elements or inaccessible structures.

The project involved over 120 TLS setups and literally a billion data points collected. From this wealth of accurate 3D data (Fig 12), the relevant pipes and structures were identified by the engineering team. Those features relevant to the expansion plans were converted to CAD elements (Fig 13). The ability to define the CAD elements in their true position, orientation and condition allowed the engineers to design their expansion elements knowing that they were fitting to “actual” elements and not just “as built” plans. Of the 503 connection points in the expansion, all bar 3 fitted without need for rework. Those three problematic joints were traced to changes in
design, not errors in the 3D GIS.

The paper has presented the philosophy that there is no such thing as bad”
spatial data, only “inappropriate” data. Estimating building heights may be suitable for a visualisation, but would be of limited use to the telco engineers. Investing heavily in a vector-based photogrammetric cityscape will need subsequent users to utilise both the accuracy and appearance of the buildings to have that significant investment returned. Project managers need to consider the implications of their decisions specifying resolution, accuracy, currency and format.

The exciting part is that survey techniques and application development is now allowing users to dictate the characteristics that their dataset requires to meet their project needs. It is critical to document and retain these characteristics with the dataset to ensure that all subsequent uses of the data are appropriate to their respective needs.

Kolbe, T. (2006) and S. Bacharach, Directions Magazine online, June 2006

Todd, P. (2005) and D. Jonas; The Use of ALS and Tidal Data to Achieve NRM Outcomes while Preserving Legal Certainly and Quantifying Spatial Uncertainty”. Proceedings of SSC2005 Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis: The National Biennial Conference of Spatial Science Institute, September 2005. Melbourne