Home | About us  | Our Advisors | Submit Papers | Submit News | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact talktous@mycoordinates.org  
 
 Previous Issues ( Preview / download )  
Testing the DVRS system
Several flight tests were conducted to study the use of the DVRS network for aircraft navigation. Two types of aircraft were used, a helicopter and a small fixed-wing airplane. A dual-frequency GPS rover receiver (Leica SR530) equipped with a DVRS GSM modem to receive the DVRS corrections was used. The test included the aircraft takeoff, enroute flying, landing and airport surface navigation. The data were processed at one-second intervals.

In the helicopter test, the GPS and GSM antennae were rigidly mounted
on an arm approximately 0.9 m long extending outside the helicopter. The arm was attached to a frame rigidly fixed inside the helicopter. No arm vibration was experienced during flight. For better GPS as well as GSM signal reception during testing, the GPS antenna was mounted high on the arm for better visibility of the sky, while the GSM antenna faced down. Figures 2 and 3 show the system installation on the aircrafts. For the fixed-wing aircraft test, the GSM antenna was installed inside the aircraft, which is acceptable for GSM communication. Both tests were carried out over the city of Dubai.

 
 
Figure 4 and 5 show the helicopter and the fixed-wing aircraft flying height and the 2-D and height positioning accuracies achieved during testing. The DVRS corrections were continuously received (dashed region in the Figures) during major parts of airport surface navigation, takeoff, enroute flying, landing and parking. During some periods, temporary loss of the signals took place. This can be mainly attributed to the use of GSM signals in sending the DVRS data, and partially to changes in the aircraft dynamics. In general, the carrier phase measurement ambiguities were resolved as integers and the average positioning accuracy, represented by coordinate standard deviations, were on the cm-level as shown in Table 2. During the periods where the DVRS corrections were received but the ambiguities were resolved in a float solution, the positioning accuracy was at the sub-meter level. However, when the DVRS signals were not received, errors grew to more than 3.5 m, which are only suitable for category I navigation (enroute flying).


Table 2. Average positioning accuracies
Solutions to the problem of breaks in reception of network corrections
Integration with the Inertial system
One method to increase the availability of the positioning accuracy at the required level is to integrate GPS with an Inertial Measuring Unit (IMU). For testing purposes and due to hardware availability, a Honeywell tactical-grade (medium accuracy) IMU system of approximately 1-10 degrees/hour gyro drift was used. For simplicity, the GPS/INS integration was carried out in a decentralized loose coupling scheme. In this approach, the GPS and IMU (INS) filters ran independently in parallel. An adaptive Kalman filtering approach was employed in the processing of the test data. An integrated GPS/INS system is also beneficial in the sense that it gives high frequency output.
In addition, the INS is useful for determination of the attitude information of the aircraft, as well as cycle slip detection and repair, and ambiguity resolution, if a centralized filtering scheme is used. The test results showed that the accuracy requirements for precision approach (category III) were generally achieved up to 25-31 seconds of the GPS data outages. This was dependent to some extent on the aircraft dynamics.

Prediction of the measurement corrections as a time series

Integration of GPS with an Inertial Measuring Unit (IMU) to bridge positioning during short breaks in reception of corrections is only a valid solution for a short period. This is due to the rapid deterioration of the IMU positioning accuracy in the standalone mode, as well as the increased cost and complexity of the hardware and software involved. Another approach is proposed for this task where all error components including corrections to the wet tropospheric error, the satellite orbital and clock errors are individually estimated at the rover. During data reception from
the reference stations, the corrections are continuously modeled as a time series and accurately predicted for several minutes ahead. The double exponential and ARIMA models were used for this purpose. When a loss of reception of the reference station data takes place, predicted measurement corrections are added to the un-differenced observables, and accurate positioning is carried out in an autonomous precise pointpositioning mode. Testing of this method showed that after 10 minutes of prediction, the positioning errors were still in the range of a few decimetres, and it was sufficient for Category III of navigation.
Conclusions
The test results show that the use of RTK multi-station reference networks (e.g. the DVRS network) in precise aircraft navigation is feasible, particularly for the airport area. This new technology can increase the coverage area compared with other GPS-navigation systems, such as airport LAAS, with significant cost reduction. Small airports can thus benefit from this service. Efficient methods for bridging positioning
should be implemented when reception of network corrections is interrupted. This can include integration with IMU or predicting the measurement corrections as a time series.
December 2005
 
Dr. Ahmed El- Mowafy
Associate Professor Civil and
environmental Department The
United Arab Emirates University Al
Ain, United Arab Emirates
Ahmed.Mowafy@uaeu.ac.ae
 
<<Previous... 2 of 2
 
“We have just scratched the surface of what photogrammetry will do for all of us in the future”
  Sections
 
My-coordinates
  Good News!  
  “Bhuvan is a visualisation tool for showcasing India’s imaging capabilities and societal applications using remote sensing.”
 
   
says Dr V Jayaraman, Director, National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, in an exclusive interview with Coordinates magazine on ‘Bhuvan’  
  India National Map Policy  
National Map Policy

Guidelines for implementing National Map policy
  Partnership  
GPS/GNSS Symposium 2009
30 Nov to 1 Dec
Tokyo, Japan
symposium@gnss-pnt.org
IGNSS Conference 2009
1-3 December
Gold coast, Quensland, Australia
ignss@ignss.org
Middle East Spatial Technology Conference & Exhibition
7 - 9 December 2009
Kingdom of Bahrain
rizwan@mohandis.org
Asia Oceania Region Workshop on GNSS
25-26 January 2010 
Bangkok, Thailand
ws@multignss.asia
GEOFORM+’2010
March 30 – April 02
Moscow, Russia   
dnj@mvk.ru
Munich Satellite Navigation Summit
9-11 March 2010
Munich, Germany    
GEOSIBERIA-2010
27 - 29 April
Novosibirsk, Russia
sula@sibfair.ru
Toulouse Space Show 2010
8-11 June
Toulouse, France
contact@toulousespaceshow.eu
ION GNSS 2010
21-24 Sept
Portland Oregon, USA
 
   
Home | About us  | Our Advisors | Submit Papers | Submit News | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact