IHO published the 4th edition of special
publication No.44 in April 1998 of IHO
standards for hydrographic surveys.
The principal aim of this publication
is to specify minimum standards for
hydrographic surveys in order that
hydrographic data collected according
to these standards is sufficiently
accurate and that the certainty of
data has to be adequately quantified
to be safely used by mariners.
The new edition of IHO standards
for hydrographic surveys describes a
very important change. The accuracy
of a survey is no longer dependent on
the scale of the analogue chart. The
accuracy as well as resolution of a survey
depends on the type of the area to be
surveyed. The preface of IHO standards
recognises that hydrographic data is alsoimportant for coastal zone management,
environment monitoring, resource
development, legal and jurisdictional
issues and coastal engineering works etc.
- To calculate the error limits for depth
accuracy the corresponding values
of 'a' and 'b' listed in above table
to be introduced into the formula
 With
'a' = constant depth error, i.e. the
sum of all constant depth error
'b*d ' = depth dependent error, i.e. the
sum of all depth dependent errors
' b' = factor of depth dependent error
' d' = depth
- For safety of navigation purposes,
the use of an accurately specified
mechanical sweep to guarantee
a minimum safe clearance depth
throughout an area may be considered
sufficient for above order surveys.
- The value of 40 m has been
chosen considering the maximum
expected draught of vessels.
- The line spacing can be expanded if
procedures for ensuring an adequate
sounding density are used.
For ports & harbours, and especially for
those where the underkeel clearance is
small, 100 % coverage of the seafloor is
required during the sounding process in
order to make sure that all potential hazards
are mapped. It is not possible by single
beam echosounder alone. So alternative
technologies available are as follows:
- Mechanical sweeping is best but time consuming and therefore expensive.
- Towing side scan sonar is
often impractical in confined
areas such as ports.
- Compact high frequency multibeam
echosounders, probably most viable
alternative for the future, which can
comply with the requirement of SP-44.
|