The ESA says the GIOVE-B satellite
will soon leave the ESA’s European
Space Research and Technology Centre
(ESTEC) in Noordwijk, the Netherlands,
where it is undergoing final preparations.
It is scheduled to be launched into
orbit from Baikonur aboard a Starsem
Soyuz/Fregat launch vehicle on April
27. The second Galileo satellite has
completed its pre-launch testing.
GIOVE-B will test novel, key technologies
for the Galileo system, such as the highprecision
passive maser clock and the
triple-channel transmission of navigation
signals. Instruments onboard the satellite
will measure the radiation and spacecraft
charging environments. Following on
from GIOVE-B, the first four satellites
of the operational constellation are under
development. They are scheduled for
launch in 2010 and will enable a systemlevel
verification of the Galileo design.or NPA (non-precision-approach) or for
rail ETCS (European train control system)
are required and will be applied for. It
seems to be a more sophisticated scenario
requiring suddenly two certifications
instead of one and just adding complexity.
Looking to figure 3 the advantages of
this approach become obvious. Without
a generic certification for the Galileo SIS
each domain would have to include in
their domain specific certification for any
application all relevant components. They
will have to ensure the reliability and
availability of the Galileo system, validate
the integrity signal and only thereafter can
work on the requirements from their own
application. The validation and verification
of the Galileo SIS does not only increase
the workload for the certification body
within the domain but will also result
in continuous efforts in all companies
contributing to any phase of the Galileo
system, like design, deployment, operation
or maintenance. With the new multimodal
certification approach these efforts are
dramatically reduced for all engaged parties,
as only for the Galileo SIS certification
the suppliers of goods or services to the
Galileo system have to participate and
to provide the necessary information.
Within a domain the efforts are reduced
as during the certification process only the
application specific requirements have to
regarded based on the one time acceptance
of the certificate for the Galileo SIS or
for the interface of the reference receiver.
Thus the new approach of a multimodal
certification reduces the duration of a
domain specific certification and perhaps
more important reduces significantly the
costs for the overall certification process.
As risk and costs are reduced, products
and services earlier available for market
entry, this should result in total in a lower
market entry level broadening the market
for service provider and manufacturers.
Now coming back to the initial question if
certification of the Galileo system is only
driven by bureaucracy in the EU, one can
say that the certification of Galileo SIS
actually is a market enabler to allow more
companies to profit with their services and
products from Galileo. In total the end
customer finally will have a wider range
with lower prices to choose from. |