|
| Results and discussions |
The results indicate no significant change
in areal strain due to Dec 26, 2004 mega
earthquake. This may be attributed to
the fact that these sites are quite distant
from the rupture plane. This can also be attributed to the almost
constant relative
shift in coordinates
of the stations. But
these results do show
significant anomalies
in the daily triangular
area for some of
the triangles for a
particular day. After a
detailed investigation
we could map these
anomalies to the
local seismic events
that have occurred
within these triangles,
the details of which
are given below.
The GAUHATIKUNMING-
AIZWAL
(GHTU-KUNMAIWL)
shows (
Figure 2) an areal
strain of ~0.28 ppm
on 9th Jan 2005 in
XY projection plane
where the average
anomaly fluctuates
between ±0.1 PPM.
Similarly, all the three
plane projections
(XY, YZ and ZX) of
GAUHATI-LUMAMI-AIZWAL (GHTULUMA-
AIWL) show large anomalies
of 0.2 PPM, -2 PPM and –0.1 PPM
on 9th Jan 2005 where the threshold
lies between ±0.1 PPM, ±1 PPM and
±0.025 PPM respectively. This may be
due to the M4.7 shallow earthquake
at 25.12ºN 98.86ºE with depth 36 km
which occurred on 7th Jan 2005 [http://
eqint.cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic/].
This event is within GHTU-KUNMAIWL
triangle and closer to GHTULUMA-
AIWL triangle (Figure 2). This
indicates possible contraction in GHTUKUNM-
AIWL and GHTU-LUMAAIWL
triangular area (XY plane).
Similarly, IISC-AIWL-HYDE (Bangalore-
Aizwal-Hyderabad) shows (Figure 3)
a dilatational strain of –0.22 PPM and
–4.25 PPM in XY and YZ planes on 19th
Jan 2005 where the threshold lies within
±0.1 PPM and ±2 PPM respectively. A
compressional strain of 0.38 PPM is traced
in YZ plane of IISC-KUNM-HYDE on
19th Jan 2005. This may be due to M5.0
earthquake (Depth = 104 km) at 22.97ºN
94.70ºE on 18th Jan 2005 [http://eqint.
cr.usgs.gov/neic/cgi-bin/epic] in Central
Burman Molasse Basin (Figure 3). The
Central Burman Molasse Basin lies
within IISC-KUNM-HYDE triangle and
closer to IISC-AIWL-HYDE triangle.
|
|

Figure 2: anomalies in the daily triangular area of GHTU-lUMA-aIwl triangle,
GHTU-KUNM-AIWl triangle and the corresponding strain (PPM) |
|

Figure 3: anomalies in the daily triangular area of IIsc-aIwl-hyde triangle,
IISC-KUNM-HYDE triangle and the corresponding strain (PPM) |
|
All triangles involving Lumami (Figure
4) at one of their vertices such as LUMAHYDE-
KODI, GBSK-LUMA-AIWL, and
GHTU-LUMA-AIWL show a slightly high
dilatational strain on 27th Dec 2004 in
ZX projection plane. The probable source
of this deformation is M4.7 tremor of
shallow depth 66 km at 24.85ºN 101.69ºE which occurred very close to Lumami and
Kunming on 26th Dec 2004 (Figure 4).
The error values have been computed for
the areal strain computations of all the
triangles and are found to be insignificant
when compared to the anomalies.
The rest of the triangles do not show
any significant daily change ratio. |

Figure 4: Anomalies in the daily triangular area of LUMA-HYDE-KODI triangle, GBSK-LUMA-
AIWL triangle, GHTU-KUNM-AIWL triangle and the corresponding strain (PPM) |
| Conclusion |
As the relative change in triangular area
between stations gives dilatational strain
which is more sensitive than the relative
change in coordinates, such a study can
be utilized for a better understanding
of deformation of a region due to local
tectonic events. This analysis when done
on a daily basis at all GPS permanent sites
would generate long time series of strain
in XY, YZ and XZ planes which would
give more insight in to the deformation
regime in the region. These strain changes
in the region can then be related to the
focal mechanism of local events which
may give further insight in to complicated
regional deformation processes. |
| References |
- Bilham, R., Engdahl, R., Feldi,
N., Satyabala, S. P., 2005, “Partial
and Complete Rupture of the
Indo-Andaman Plate Boundary
1847-2004”, Seismological Research
Letters, 76, pp. 299 – 311.
- Jade, S., Vijayan, M. S. M., Gupta,
S. S., Kumar, P. D., Gaur, V. K.,
Arumugam, S., 2005, “Effect of
M9.3 Sumatra Andaman Islands
Earthquake of 26th December 2004 at
Some Permanent and Campaign Stations
in the Indian Continent”, International
Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 28,
Nos. 13-14, July 2007, 3045-3054.
- Jade, S., Ananda, M, B., Kumar,
P. D., Banerjee, S., “Coseismic
and post- seismic displacements
in Andaman and Nicobar Islands
from GPS measurements”, Current
Science, 88, pp. 1980-1984.
- Murai, S., Araki, H., July 2005, “Was
Early Warning of Sumatra Earthquake
Possible?”, Coordinates pp. 8 – 11.
|
|
 |
Saigeetha A J
CMMACS,
Bangalore |
|
 |
Vijayan M S M
CMMACS,
Bangalore |
|
| << Previous Page |
| Feb 2008 |
|
|
|